Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

AC Incorporated

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+12194642442 sales@acincorporated.com Visit Website

About AC Incorporated

At ACI, their business is to get the marketing results you need to develop your business. With shared priorities and a common focus, establishing a partnership with ACI is your first step to develop your brand and boost the sales of your product or service. Their years of advertising experience and a perfectly-sized agency affords us the liberty of giving their clients the accessibility and personal service not typical of those larger than them.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development

Industries Served

Aerospace & Defense Advertising & Marketing Healthcare Manufacturing Telecommunications Sports & Fitness Fashion & Apparel

AC Incorporated Reviews

Write a Review

E-commerce build that united our digital and in-store inventory for the first time

Flynn Buchanan / GM of Technology - Pacific Rim Commerce Group
Verified
Jan 12, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustrySports & Fitness
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Pacific Rim Commerce Group, a growth-stage Sports & Fitness business based in Perth, Australia. As GM of Technology my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our E-commerce Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full E-commerce Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their E-commerce Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Sports & Fitness contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Web platform that turned our digital presence from a cost centre into a revenue driver

Jia Hui Tan / VP of Engineering - RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 11, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryFashion & Apparel
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Engineering at RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Fashion & Apparel operations in Singapore. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Fashion & Apparel segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Web Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Web Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Web Development programme in the Fashion & Apparel space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 1988
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.2
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.4

FAQs

Does AC Incorporated actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, AC Incorporated included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span VR App Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has been operating since 1988.
What makes AC Incorporated worth considering over other options?
What tends to set AC Incorporated apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 1988, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What happens with AC Incorporated after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, AC Incorporated typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing, and it has been operating since 1988.
Is AC Incorporated more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where AC Incorporated is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What does AC Incorporated's actual delivery process look like week to week?
AC Incorporated generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Has AC Incorporated actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like AC Incorporated — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span VR App Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with AC Incorporated?
Most companies structured like AC Incorporated give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with AC Incorporated?
Most businesses reach AC Incorporated through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span VR App Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has been operating since 1988.
What's actually in AC Incorporated's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but AC Incorporated commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span VR App Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Can AC Incorporated take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like AC Incorporated — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Advertising & Marketing, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare, Sports & Fitness and Manufacturing, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies