Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Agenzia SMT

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.7/5 (7 reviews)
+390645492026 socialmediateam@agenziasmt.it Visit Website

About Agenzia SMT

They study the winning strategy to accompany the customer's online communication, supporting him in the marketing and construction of the digital image and content. They follow the promotion of the Brand, the Company or the Product as if it were ours, managing the interaction with users and involving them. They design responsive websites to make you reachable from all devices. they provide a navigation experience that works because it uses mobile sites.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Social Media Marketing Advertising, Media

Industries Served

Fashion & Apparel Events & Event Management Energy & Utilities Construction Agriculture Telecommunications Nonprofit & NGO

Agenzia SMT Reviews

Write a Review

Immersive experience that generated more media coverage than anything we had shipped before

Liselotte Bakker / Head of Platform Engineering - Harbour Digital BV
Verified
Feb 20, 2026

Project summary: Time-to-market for new tariff structures had become a direct competitive disadvantage. Our product configuration layer was the bottleneck and it needed to be modernised as a priority.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationAug 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Harbour Digital BV operates in the Telecommunications sector with headquarters in Utrecht, Netherlands. In my role as Head of Platform Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our AR/VR Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily AR/VR Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Infrastructure-as-code that our SRE team treats as a reference example

Declan Hartley / Chief Digital Officer - Southern Cross Technology
Verified
Jan 18, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCloud Services
IndustryNonprofit & NGO
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJan 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Digital Officer at Southern Cross Technology I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Nonprofit & NGO operations in Sydney, Australia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Nonprofit & NGO segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Cloud Services changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cloud Services delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Nonprofit & NGO experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.7/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.9
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Can I just hire developers from Agenzia SMT to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Agenzia SMT, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What's actually in Agenzia SMT's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Agenzia SMT commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What happens with Agenzia SMT after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Agenzia SMT typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Agriculture, Telecommunications, Events & Event Management and Construction, and it has served clients in Italy.
Can Agenzia SMT take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Agenzia SMT — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has been operating since N/A.
Will Agenzia SMT sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Agenzia SMT, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in Italy, and it has experience across industries such as Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Agriculture, Telecommunications, Events & Event Management and Construction.
What makes Agenzia SMT worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Agenzia SMT apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in N/A, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Agenzia SMT only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Agenzia SMT isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Italy, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Agenzia SMT to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Agenzia SMT, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has served clients in Italy, and its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
What should I expect to pay to work with Agenzia SMT?
What Agenzia SMT charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Agenzia SMT's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $10000+.
What kind of software work does Agenzia SMT take on?
Agenzia SMT typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Advertising, Media, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing, UI-UX Design and Web Design.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies