Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Appliquette

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (6 reviews)
+61872006708 info@appliquette.com.au Visit Website

About Appliquette

They are a team of skilled developers developing unique solutions. They are supremely positive in providing you a high quality, issue-free products & have the history to back this up. Their team of mobile app developers is leaders in developing the apps by utilizing the UX and UI design to reach out the clients in prospective business sections. Truly one of the best mobile app development company.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Ruby on Rails Development Content Management System

Industries Served

Food & Beverage Government & Public Sector Agriculture Telecommunications Energy & Utilities

Appliquette Reviews

Write a Review

The first content management system we have deployed that editors genuinely prefer

Danielle Westbrook / Chief Digital Officer - BlueSky Retail Holdings
Verified
Mar 13, 2026

Project summary: Grid modernisation funding required us to demonstrate demand-response capability. The machine learning models existed on paper; we needed an engineering partner to build and productionise them.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
BlueSky Retail Holdings operates in the Energy & Utilities sector with headquarters in Chicago, USA. In my role as Chief Digital Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Energy & Utilities segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The CMS Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end CMS Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Energy & Utilities sector looking for CMS Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.3/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.2

FAQs

What kinds of industries has Appliquette actually built for?
Appliquette has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Agriculture, Energy & Utilities, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications and Food & Beverage.
What should I expect to pay to work with Appliquette?
What Appliquette charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Appliquette's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $100000+.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Appliquette?
Most companies structured like Appliquette give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Content Management System, Mobile App Development, Ruby on Rails Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has served clients in Australia.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Appliquette?
Most businesses reach Appliquette through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in Australia, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Will Appliquette sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Appliquette, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Energy & Utilities, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications and Food & Beverage, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Appliquette instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Appliquette a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in Australia, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
Has Appliquette actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Appliquette — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Energy & Utilities, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications and Food & Beverage, and it has served clients in Australia.
Is Appliquette more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Appliquette is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in Australia, and its listed capabilities span Content Management System, Mobile App Development, Ruby on Rails Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
Would Appliquette be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Appliquette tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Energy & Utilities, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications and Food & Beverage, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What's actually in Appliquette's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Appliquette commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in Australia, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies