Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Arkenea

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.1/5 (6 reviews)
+14083206361 sales@arkenea.com Visit Website

About Arkenea

Arkenea is the IT Consulting company designed to help founders of fast-growing & venture-funded companies. They help every step of the way organization you where you are, with the passion & creativity to take you more. It is mobile and web development company. They give different tech solutions offered by some skilled teams. They have experts in every area they work on. One of the deserving company in this detailed list.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design

Industries Served

Real Estate Education Travel & Hospitality Construction Logistics & Supply Chain

Arkenea Reviews

Write a Review

Mixed reality build that landed exactly where the brief pointed and then went further

Bram de Vries / Chief Technology Officer - Windmill Tech BV
Verified
Jan 20, 2026

Project summary: Track-and-trace capability had gone from a differentiator to a table-stakes requirement and our platform had neither. We needed to close the gap before our next enterprise tender cycle.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryLogistics & Supply Chain
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMay 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Windmill Tech BV, a growth-stage Logistics & Supply Chain business based in Amsterdam, Netherlands. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Logistics & Supply Chain market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The AR/VR Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily AR/VR Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AR/VR Development programme in the Logistics & Supply Chain space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2011
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.1/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
3.9
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.3

FAQs

Can I just hire developers from Arkenea to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Arkenea, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Arkenea instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Arkenea a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Education, Travel & Hospitality, Real Estate and Logistics & Supply Chain, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What makes Arkenea worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Arkenea apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2011, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Will Arkenea sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Arkenea, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2011.
Can Arkenea take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Arkenea — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Education, Travel & Hospitality, Real Estate and Logistics & Supply Chain, and it has served clients in USA.
Is Arkenea more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Arkenea is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What does Arkenea's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Arkenea generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What kind of software work does Arkenea take on?
Arkenea typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development and Web Development.
What should I expect to pay to work with Arkenea?
What Arkenea charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Arkenea's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $50000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies