Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Atlantida

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+34915358404 atlantida@atlantida.es Visit Website

About Atlantida

Atlantida was established in 1993, growing exponentially both in the organization joined to the company and in the coverage of services that they provide their clients. They identify strategic areas of the company responsive to optimization & technological improvement that enhance performance, increase communication with customers. Their mission is to empower the digital transformation in companies and people, making life more simple.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Web Design Digital Strategy

Industries Served

Food & Beverage Logistics & Supply Chain Gaming & Gambling Travel & Hospitality Media & Entertainment Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology

Atlantida Reviews

Write a Review

Blockchain expertise that came with clear explanations, not just technical jargon

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Mar 27, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationAug 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd is an established Gaming & Gambling organisation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. My role as VP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Blockchain Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Blockchain Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Gaming & Gambling contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Gaming & Gambling experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Blockchain Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Blockchain Development programme in the Gaming & Gambling space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Compliance programme delivered on time and approved by the regulator without remediation

Clémentine Aubert / Head of Digital Products - Arc-en-Ciel Digital SAS
Verified
Mar 26, 2026

Project summary: Regulatory submission timelines required a document management platform that could handle version control, access permissions, and audit trails at a scale our existing tools were not designed for.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Digital Products at Arc-en-Ciel Digital SAS I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology operations in Bordeaux, France. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cybersecurity delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Cybersecurity approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Bordeaux, France and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology sector looking for Cybersecurity expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 1994
Employees 500 - 999
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.9
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.9
Communication
4.7

FAQs

What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Atlantida?
Most businesses reach Atlantida through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
What happens with Atlantida after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Atlantida typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage, and it has been operating since 1994.
What kind of software work does Atlantida take on?
Atlantida typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
Has Atlantida actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Atlantida — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Atlantida instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Atlantida a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in Spain, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Atlantida?
Most companies structured like Atlantida give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage, and it reports a team size of 500 - 999 professionals.
Would Atlantida be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Atlantida tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage, and it has been operating since 1994.
What does Atlantida's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Atlantida generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in Spain, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics & Supply Chain, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Food & Beverage.
What should I expect to pay to work with Atlantida?
What Atlantida charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Atlantida's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies