Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Clever Age

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (6 reviews)
+85295209169 commercial@clever-age.com Visit Website

About Clever Age

Their experts in interactive communications, technical architecture and production infrastructure operate at every stage of the production series. They are passionate about the Web and they constantly seek to infuse their projects with a sense of exception. They strive to produce meaning and value for our clients and their end users.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development App Marketing

Industries Served

Construction Aerospace & Defense Media & Entertainment Information Technology Government & Public Sector Gaming & Gambling

Clever Age Reviews

Write a Review

End-to-end quality programme that halved our post-release incident rate inside three months

Théo Beaumont / VP of Innovation - Laurentian Tech Partners
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
3.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMay 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Innovation at Laurentian Tech Partners I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Gaming & Gambling operations in Montreal, Canada. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Gaming & Gambling segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Quality Assurance & Testing changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Quality Assurance & Testing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2001
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.2/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.1
Communication
3.9

FAQs

What's actually in Clever Age's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Clever Age commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Media & Entertainment, Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense and Information Technology, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Clever Age?
Most companies structured like Clever Age give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Media & Entertainment, Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense and Information Technology, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Clever Age?
Most businesses reach Clever Age through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, VR App Development, App Marketing and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Is Clever Age more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Clever Age is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, VR App Development, App Marketing and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2001.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Clever Age instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Clever Age a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, VR App Development, App Marketing and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2001.
Does Clever Age only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Clever Age isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What does Clever Age's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Clever Age generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, VR App Development, App Marketing and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Would Clever Age be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Clever Age tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Media & Entertainment, Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense and Information Technology, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Can I just hire developers from Clever Age to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Clever Age, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Media & Entertainment, Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense and Information Technology, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies