Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Enable Startup

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+84778506781 hello@enablestartup.com Visit Website

About Enable Startup

Enable Startup is a one-stop IT solution provider based in Da Nang, Vietnam. Founded in 2016 on genuine passion for technologies, we have since then embarked relentlessly on more than 50 projects with 30 global businesses of all shapes and sizes across11 countries. Currently, under one roof, we pool talents with a broad spectrum of expertises: enterprise & startup consultants, data scientists, software engineers, designers and marketers.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development IoT App Development UI-UX Design Blockchain Development

Industries Served

Agriculture Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Telecommunications Financial Services Aerospace & Defense Government & Public Sector

Enable Startup Reviews

Write a Review

Outsourced IT that improved both the outcome and the cost line simultaneously

Abdullah Al-Shehri / Head of Innovation - Desert Tech Ventures
Verified
Feb 17, 2026

Project summary: Digital service standards required all citizen-facing applications to meet accessibility and performance benchmarks that our inherited systems failed. Remediation was not viable — we needed a replacement.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeIT Managed Services
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Innovation at Desert Tech Ventures I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Government & Public Sector operations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Government & Public Sector market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The IT Managed Services requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IT Managed Services delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Government & Public Sector sector had used them for a comparable IT Managed Services engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, IT Managed Services depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Government & Public Sector sector looking for IT Managed Services expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

CRM that finally unified our sales, marketing, and customer success teams in one system

Danielle Westbrook / Chief Digital Officer - BlueSky Retail Holdings
Verified
Jan 18, 2026

Project summary: Evolving open banking obligations required us to rebuild our API layer from the ground up. The architecture needed to be compliant by default, not bolted on after the fact.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryFinancial Services
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationAug 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at BlueSky Retail Holdings, a growth-stage Financial Services business based in Chicago, USA. As Chief Digital Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant CRM Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily CRM Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their CRM Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Financial Services contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2016
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.1
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.2

FAQs

Can I just hire developers from Enable Startup to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Enable Startup, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2016.
What kind of software work does Enable Startup take on?
Enable Startup typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Blockchain Development, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
What happens with Enable Startup after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Enable Startup typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense, Financial Services and Telecommunications.
Roughly how long does a project with Enable Startup take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, Enable Startup can scale resources based on project urgency.
Can Enable Startup take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Enable Startup — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense, Financial Services and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2016.
Has Enable Startup actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Enable Startup — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has served clients in Vietnam, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Is Enable Startup more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Enable Startup is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Government & Public Sector, Aerospace & Defense, Financial Services and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Does Enable Startup only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Enable Startup isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Vietnam, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What should I expect to pay to work with Enable Startup?
What Enable Startup charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Enable Startup's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Enable Startup?
Most businesses reach Enable Startup through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in Vietnam, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies