About Erakit

Erakit is a leading mobile app development company which is established in 2009. They ensure customer comfort by giving best technologies and they pay respects to an excellent detail in every single project they take. They believe in what they do, and in what their customers try for, and their view is that belief is very powerful in accomplishing goals than small results or quotes. One of the best mobile app development company.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Branding Game Development

Industries Served

Media & Entertainment Automotive Events & Event Management Advertising & Marketing Legal Services Travel & Hospitality

Erakit Reviews

Write a Review

A studio team who played the game obsessively and built it accordingly

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: Our mobile app had a 2.9-star average review score. The two themes in every negative review were speed and booking flow complexity — both were solvable with the right engineering partner.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustryTravel & Hospitality
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Northumbria FinTech Ltd, a growth-stage Travel & Hospitality business based in Edinburgh, UK. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Game Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Game Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Game Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Travel & Hospitality contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Game Development programme in the Travel & Hospitality space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.3/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.3

FAQs

Does Erakit actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Erakit included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Travel & Hospitality, Legal Services, Events & Event Management, Automotive and Media & Entertainment, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Does Erakit only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Erakit isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Saudi-arabia, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What kind of software work does Erakit take on?
Erakit typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Branding, Game Development, Mobile App Development and Web Development.
Can I just hire developers from Erakit to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Erakit, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Game Development, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What should I expect to pay to work with Erakit?
What Erakit charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Erakit's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $25000+.
Would Erakit be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Erakit tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has served clients in Saudi-arabia, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What's actually in Erakit's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Erakit commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in Saudi-arabia, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What happens with Erakit after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Erakit typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Game Development, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
Has Erakit actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Erakit — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has served clients in Saudi-arabia, and it has been operating since N/A.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Erakit to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Erakit, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Game Development, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.