About Eureka Software
Eureka Software is a software development company that turns ideas into working products. Their core services include Mobile App Development. The company operates with a team of 10 - 49 professionals. Clients can expect pricing around $150 - $199/hr, with projects averaging about $25,000. Overall, Eureka Software is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Services
Industries Served
Eureka Software Reviews
Write a ReviewAutomation that freed our team from repetitive analysis and let them focus on strategy
Declan Hartley / Chief Digital Officer - Southern Cross TechnologyJan 01, 2026
Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.
The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.
Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review
Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project
Questions & Answers
Full-funnel programme that turned marketing from a cost argument into a revenue conversation
Jia Hui Tan / VP of Engineering - RedDot Technologies Pte LtdJan 01, 2026
Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.
Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.
Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring
We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs