Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Exposit

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+161793317 anna.gerish@exposit.com Visit Website

About Exposit

They provide full-cycle software development services: from initial analysis and conceptual evaluation to system maintenance. They develop expectations and provide the best performance to wow their customers. It is one of the best web development company. They are good to allow you a roots funding, development and a mentorship assistance for developing a scalable app.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development Chat Bots & AI Development Mobile App Design App Marketing iPhone App Development

Industries Served

Legal Services Events & Event Management Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing Financial Services Sports & Fitness Gaming & Gambling

Exposit Reviews

Write a Review

Predictive models that have measurably changed how we approach every planning cycle

Tobias Lindemann / Leiter Digitalisierung - Lindemann Industrie GmbH
Verified
Feb 04, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustrySports & Fitness
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Lindemann Industrie GmbH is an established Sports & Fitness organisation headquartered in Berlin, Germany. My role as Leiter Digitalisierung covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant AI & Machine Learning investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily AI & Machine Learning, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Sports & Fitness experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Sports & Fitness network — in both cases to peers facing AI & Machine Learning challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Performance-first web development that Google Core Vitals confirmed was the right approach

Théo Beaumont / VP of Innovation - Laurentian Tech Partners
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Laurentian Tech Partners, a growth-stage Gaming & Gambling business based in Montreal, Canada. As VP of Innovation my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Web Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Web Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Gaming & Gambling sector had used them for a comparable Web Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Web Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Montreal, Canada and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Web Development programme in the Gaming & Gambling space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2012
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6

FAQs

What happens with Exposit after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Exposit typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What does Exposit's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Exposit generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Does Exposit only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Exposit isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Exposit?
Most businesses reach Exposit through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What should I expect to pay to work with Exposit?
What Exposit charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Exposit's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
What's actually in Exposit's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Exposit commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Legal Services, Manufacturing and Financial Services.
Can I just hire developers from Exposit to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Exposit, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Legal Services, Manufacturing and Financial Services, and its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Exposit?
Most companies structured like Exposit give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Legal Services, Manufacturing and Financial Services.
Would Exposit be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Exposit tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, VR App Development and App Marketing, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What makes Exposit worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Exposit apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2012, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies