About FDV Solutions
FDV Solutions works with clients to plan, build, and ship digital products. FDV Solutions focuses on Mobile App Development and Custom Software Development. With 50 - 249 people on staff, FDV Solutions can take on projects of varying size. Typical hourly rates run around $50 - $99/hr, with an average project cost near $10,000. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with FDV Solutions.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Services
Industries Served
FDV Solutions Reviews
Write a ReviewOutsourced IT that improved both the outcome and the cost line simultaneously
Gustavo Ferreira / VP of Technology - Amazônia Digital LtdaFeb 11, 2026
Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.
The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.
Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable
Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it
Questions & Answers
Cloud architecture that reduced our monthly infrastructure spend by over a third
Bilal Chaudhry / Co-Founder & CTO - Indus Software HouseJan 07, 2026
Project summary: Our audience data was fragmented across eight tools with no single identity layer. Personalisation had become impossible without first solving the data foundation.
The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.
Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review
We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs