Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Get Found In Town

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+19413121130 info@getfoundintown.com Visit Website

About Get Found In Town

Get Found In Town is a software development company that turns ideas into working products. Their core services include Web Development. Its team includes 2 - 9 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Projects with this company average about $2,500,000. These details offer a useful starting point when evaluating Get Found In Town.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development

Industries Served

Fashion & Apparel Human Resources Government & Public Sector Mining & Metals Environmental Services Aerospace & Defense

Get Found In Town Reviews

Write a Review

A team that understood the difference between AI that demos well and AI that runs in prod

Matthieu Renard / Directeur Technique - Lumière Technologies SAS
Verified
Jan 08, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryEnvironmental Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Directeur Technique at Lumière Technologies SAS I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Environmental Services operations in Paris, France. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Environmental Services segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The AI & Machine Learning changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full AI & Machine Learning lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AI & Machine Learning programme in the Environmental Services space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Responsive, accessible, and fast — every standard met, every deadline hit

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 01, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd operates in the Aerospace & Defense sector with headquarters in Singapore. In my role as CTO I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Web Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Web Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Web Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Aerospace & Defense contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Aerospace & Defense network — in both cases to peers facing Web Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.0

FAQs

How do I actually get a real proposal out of Get Found In Town instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Get Found In Town a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has been operating since 2010.
Would Get Found In Town be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Get Found In Town tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals.
What kinds of industries has Get Found In Town actually built for?
Get Found In Town has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals.
Does Get Found In Town actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Get Found In Town included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Can Get Found In Town take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Get Found In Town — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What should I expect to pay to work with Get Found In Town?
What Get Found In Town charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Get Found In Town's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $2500000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Get Found In Town?
Most businesses reach Get Found In Town through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Is Get Found In Town more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Get Found In Town is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals.
What does Get Found In Town's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Get Found In Town generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Human Resources, Fashion & Apparel, Aerospace & Defense, Government & Public Sector, Environmental Services and Mining & Metals, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Nearby Companies