Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Intelivita

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+447783972793 support@intelivita.com Visit Website

About Intelivita

Intelivita is the leading mobile app development company in Leeds. Over the years we have been instrumental in producing unique and highly scalable software development & designing solutions for their global client base which covers developing startups & established enterprises alike. Their dedicated team of specialists will remain to raise the bar & strive to exceed their commitment to clients with developing technology & forward-looking vision.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Web Design Game Development

Industries Served

Environmental Services Events & Event Management Fashion & Apparel Energy & Utilities Travel & Hospitality Logistics & Supply Chain Agriculture

Intelivita Reviews

Write a Review

Monetisation system integrated in a way that players accepted rather than resented

Declan Hartley / Chief Digital Officer - Southern Cross Technology
Verified
Mar 06, 2026

Project summary: Warehouse management inefficiencies were adding cost and introducing errors at a rate that was becoming visible to clients. A modernised WMS was the agreed solution internally — we needed a partner to build it.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustryLogistics & Supply Chain
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Southern Cross Technology, a growth-stage Logistics & Supply Chain business based in Sydney, Australia. As Chief Digital Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Logistics & Supply Chain market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Game Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Game Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Logistics & Supply Chain experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Sydney, Australia and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Logistics & Supply Chain sector looking for Game Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Responsive, accessible, and fast — every standard met, every deadline hit

Gustavo Ferreira / VP of Technology - Amazônia Digital Ltda
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryAgriculture
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Technology at Amazônia Digital Ltda I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Agriculture operations in São Paulo, Brazil. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Agriculture segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Web Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Web Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Agriculture experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Agriculture network — in both cases to peers facing Web Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.8
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.7

FAQs

What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Intelivita?
Most businesses reach Intelivita through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development, VR App Development and Web Design, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Does Intelivita actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Intelivita included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development, VR App Development and Web Design, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Intelivita?
Most companies structured like Intelivita give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development, VR App Development and Web Design, and it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Logistics & Supply Chain, Agriculture and Events & Event Management.
What happens with Intelivita after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Intelivita typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Logistics & Supply Chain, Agriculture and Events & Event Management, and it has been operating since 2014.
Would Intelivita be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Intelivita tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Logistics & Supply Chain, Agriculture and Events & Event Management, and its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development, VR App Development and Web Design.
Does Intelivita only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Intelivita isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can I just hire developers from Intelivita to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Intelivita, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Logistics & Supply Chain, Agriculture and Events & Event Management, and it has been operating since 2014.
Can Intelivita take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Intelivita — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Energy & Utilities, Fashion & Apparel, Logistics & Supply Chain, Agriculture and Events & Event Management, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Intelivita to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Intelivita, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development, VR App Development and Web Design, and it has been operating since 2014.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies