Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

June Advertising

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (7 reviews)
+14025026575 info@juneadv.com Visit Website

About June Advertising

JUNE is a creative agency established in 2005, they started with one client, a few skills and dogged determination. Since that time they have assisted a long list of marketing managers, product owners, and entrepreneurs by putting creativity to work and delivering on their vision. They stimulate each other to learn and improve skills & practices, which they share with their customers for the best results.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development App Marketing Private Blockchains

Industries Served

Nonprofit & NGO Events & Event Management Agriculture Fashion & Apparel Environmental Services Aerospace & Defense

June Advertising Reviews

Write a Review

A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved

Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud AB
Verified
Feb 22, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryEnvironmental Services
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Nordic Cloud AB operates in the Environmental Services sector with headquarters in Stockholm, Sweden. In my role as Chief Technology Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Industry-Specific Solutions delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Environmental Services network — in both cases to peers facing Industry-Specific Solutions challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Managed IT that made our internal teams forget infrastructure was something they once worried about

Abdullah Al-Shehri / Head of Innovation - Desert Tech Ventures
Verified
Jan 08, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Managed Services
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Desert Tech Ventures is an established Aerospace & Defense organisation headquartered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. My role as Head of Innovation covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IT Managed Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Aerospace & Defense sector looking for IT Managed Services expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2005
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.6/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6

FAQs

What should I expect to pay to work with June Advertising?
What June Advertising charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, June Advertising's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $10000+.
What makes June Advertising worth considering over other options?
What tends to set June Advertising apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2005, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Can I just hire developers from June Advertising to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like June Advertising, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What kinds of industries has June Advertising actually built for?
June Advertising has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense.
Does June Advertising actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, June Advertising included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Roughly how long does a project with June Advertising take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, June Advertising can scale resources based on project urgency.
Can June Advertising take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like June Advertising — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Has June Advertising actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like June Advertising — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of June Advertising instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving June Advertising a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like June Advertising to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as June Advertising, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture, Events & Event Management, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its listed capabilities span Private Blockchains, App Marketing, Web Development and Mobile App Development.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies