Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Liqui-Site

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+18453537771 info@liqui-site.com Visit Website

About Liqui-Site

Liqui-Site is a digital company that delivers leads, sales, and higher profitability. An innovative team, they are driven by relationships, solutions and social good. They believe that volunteering with local causes in their community allows them to make the greatest impact. An innovative team of web development and marketing experts, they are driven by relationships, solutions and social good.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Crypto Exchange Development Supply Chain Blockchain

Industries Served

Aerospace & Defense Insurance Advertising & Marketing Information Technology Sports & Fitness Legal Services Mining & Metals

Liqui-Site Reviews

Write a Review

Delivered on scope, on time, and with code quality that passed our strictest review

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Apr 04, 2026

Project summary: Matter management had become a significant overhead for our fee earners. Every hour spent on administration was an hour not spent on billable advisory work — the business case was straightforward.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryLegal Services
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationApr 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Engineering at Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Legal Services operations in Dublin, Ireland. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Legal Services segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Software Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Software Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Software Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Legal Services contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Software Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Legal Services network — in both cases to peers facing Software Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved

Dominic Fairfax / Head of Digital Transformation - Arcadian Consulting Ltd
Verified
Jan 24, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryMining & Metals
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Arcadian Consulting Ltd operates in the Mining & Metals sector with headquarters in London, UK. In my role as Head of Digital Transformation I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Mining & Metals market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Low-Code / No-Code Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Low-Code / No-Code Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Mining & Metals sector had used them for a comparable Low-Code / No-Code Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Low-Code / No-Code Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Mining & Metals experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Low-Code / No-Code Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Mining & Metals network — in both cases to peers facing Low-Code / No-Code Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2003
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Does Liqui-Site actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Liqui-Site included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What kind of software work does Liqui-Site take on?
Liqui-Site typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Crypto Exchange Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Supply Chain Blockchain.
Roughly how long does a project with Liqui-Site take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Liqui-Site can scale resources based on project urgency.
Can Liqui-Site take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Liqui-Site — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and it has been operating since 2003.
What's actually in Liqui-Site's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Liqui-Site commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Information Technology, Legal Services, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Aerospace & Defense, and it has been operating since 2003.
Will Liqui-Site sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Liqui-Site, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Information Technology, Legal Services, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Aerospace & Defense, and it has been operating since 2003.
What should I expect to pay to work with Liqui-Site?
What Liqui-Site charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Liqui-Site's typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $25000+.
What does Liqui-Site's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Liqui-Site generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What happens with Liqui-Site after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Liqui-Site typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What kinds of industries has Liqui-Site actually built for?
Liqui-Site has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Advertising & Marketing, Information Technology, Legal Services, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Aerospace & Defense.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies