Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Naeka

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+33458003260 contact@naeka.fr Visit Website

About Naeka

Naeka is the best web development company. They have been continually improving their expertise and learning latest skills since they first started. The knowledge they have obtained from their experience helps them to face the difficulties of today. They always offer an option to standard web companies. It deserves to be placed on this top 10 list.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Unity 3D Game Development Crypto Exchange Development

Industries Served

Manufacturing Telecommunications Media & Entertainment Healthcare Advertising & Marketing

Naeka Reviews

Write a Review

Purpose-built software that made our competitors' off-the-shelf tools look obsolete

Hyun-Su Lim / Director of Platform - Hanam Tech Solutions
Verified
Jan 12, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of Platform at Hanam Tech Solutions I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Manufacturing operations in Incheon, South Korea. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Software Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Software Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Manufacturing contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Data engineering quality that will support our growth for years without a rebuild

Lars Pfeiffer / VP of Technology - NordTech Logistik GmbH
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeData & Analytics
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationFeb 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at NordTech Logistik GmbH, a growth-stage Manufacturing business based in Hamburg, Germany. As VP of Technology my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Manufacturing market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Data & Analytics requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Data & Analytics delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Data & Analytics programme in the Manufacturing space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.8
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.9

FAQs

What makes Naeka worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Naeka apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2009, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Naeka actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Naeka included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Advertising & Marketing and Media & Entertainment, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What kind of software work does Naeka take on?
Naeka typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development.
Would Naeka be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Naeka tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Advertising & Marketing and Media & Entertainment.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Naeka?
Most businesses reach Naeka through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What should I expect to pay to work with Naeka?
What Naeka charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Naeka's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Will Naeka sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Naeka, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Advertising & Marketing and Media & Entertainment, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Can I just hire developers from Naeka to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Naeka, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
Can Naeka take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Naeka — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Advertising & Marketing and Media & Entertainment, and its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, Web Development and Mobile App Development.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies