Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Neocodis

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+32488945123 j.morshead@neocodis.com Visit Website

About Neocodis

Neocodis is a web design, web development & mobile application development company. With a team of experienced developers, different designers, and skilled project managers, they shall have all the tools that you want to make a wondrous product. They provide access to their team of developers during their downtime before their next project begins.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development Mobile App Design App Marketing iPhone App Development Supply Chain Blockchain

Industries Served

Real Estate Logistics & Supply Chain Advertising & Marketing Gaming & Gambling Financial Services

Neocodis Reviews

Write a Review

A digital marketing partner who optimised for business outcomes, not vanity metrics

Yuki Hashimoto / Head of Product Development - East Asia Commerce KK
Verified
Jan 11, 2026

Project summary: Our trading platform had been extended incrementally for seven years. Latency was degrading, technical debt was compounding, and a clean rebuild was no longer optional.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Product Development at East Asia Commerce KK I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Financial Services operations in Osaka, Japan. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Digital Marketing investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Digital Marketing, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Digital Marketing work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Financial Services network — in both cases to peers facing Digital Marketing challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Finance and operations now work from identical numbers — the value of that cannot be overstated

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 07, 2026

Project summary: Track-and-trace capability had gone from a differentiator to a table-stakes requirement and our platform had neither. We needed to close the gap before our next enterprise tender cycle.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryLogistics & Supply Chain
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMay 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As CTO at Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Logistics & Supply Chain operations in Singapore. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end ERP Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Logistics & Supply Chain sector had used them for a comparable ERP Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, ERP Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the ERP Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2008
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.3

FAQs

Does Neocodis actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Neocodis included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development, and it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Real Estate and Gaming & Gambling.
What happens with Neocodis after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Neocodis typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Real Estate and Gaming & Gambling, and its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development.
What kind of software work does Neocodis take on?
Neocodis typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development.
What kinds of industries has Neocodis actually built for?
Neocodis has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Logistics & Supply Chain, Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Real Estate and Gaming & Gambling.
Does Neocodis only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Neocodis isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What makes Neocodis worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Neocodis apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2008, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Would Neocodis be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Neocodis tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Real Estate and Gaming & Gambling, and its listed capabilities span iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development.
What should I expect to pay to work with Neocodis?
What Neocodis charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Neocodis's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Will Neocodis sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Neocodis, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Real Estate and Gaming & Gambling, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies