About Promet Source

They turn around client satisfaction and producing dynamic solutions delivering real measurable results. They don’t just work for their clients, they work with their clients as a seamless addition to their team. Their core focus is to encourage their strategy and provide groundbreaking results with their approach. They have a success rate of making all their projects with good feedback from their clients.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development Mobile App Design App Marketing

Industries Served

Mining & Metals Travel & Hospitality Advertising & Marketing Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Energy & Utilities Financial Services

Promet Source Reviews

Write a Review

An honest assessment of where we were, followed by a credible plan for where we needed to go

Tobias Lindemann / Leiter Digitalisierung - Lindemann Industrie GmbH
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: Our trading platform had been extended incrementally for seven years. Latency was degrading, technical debt was compounding, and a clean rebuild was no longer optional.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Consulting
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Lindemann Industrie GmbH, a growth-stage Financial Services business based in Berlin, Germany. As Leiter Digitalisierung my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Financial Services segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The IT Consulting changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IT Consulting, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their IT Consulting approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Financial Services contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Berlin, Germany and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2003
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.7/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.8
Schedule
4.8
Cost
4.8
Communication
4.6

FAQs

What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Promet Source?
Most companies structured like Promet Source give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Promet Source to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Promet Source, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Energy & Utilities, Mining & Metals, Travel & Hospitality, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Financial Services, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does Promet Source only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Promet Source isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Has Promet Source actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Promet Source — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Energy & Utilities, Mining & Metals, Travel & Hospitality, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Financial Services.
What makes Promet Source worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Promet Source apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2003, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What does Promet Source's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Promet Source generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Energy & Utilities, Mining & Metals, Travel & Hospitality, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Financial Services, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What kind of software work does Promet Source take on?
Promet Source typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development.
What's actually in Promet Source's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Promet Source commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Energy & Utilities, Mining & Metals, Travel & Hospitality, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Financial Services, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What should I expect to pay to work with Promet Source?
What Promet Source charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Promet Source's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $2500000+.