Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Red Rabbits AS

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+4724200048 hello@redrabbits.com Visit Website

About Red Rabbits AS

They believe that their interest and a deep understanding of why things are the way they are and why people think and behave the way they do is their most critical design tool. Their mission is to determine real-world difficulties by linking the gap between a company, product, branding, marketing, and tech, with meaningful use of design and technology.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development App Marketing Crypto Exchange Development

Industries Served

Nonprofit & NGO Insurance Legal Services Gaming & Gambling Energy & Utilities Aerospace & Defense

Red Rabbits AS Reviews

Write a Review

Sensor network and analytics layer built by engineers who understood both halves equally

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Jan 28, 2026

Project summary: Our field service management system had not been updated significantly in six years. Rising technician count and increasing job complexity had exposed every one of its limitations.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationApr 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd operates in the Energy & Utilities sector with headquarters in Dublin, Ireland. In my role as VP of Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant IoT Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IoT Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Energy & Utilities sector had used them for a comparable IoT Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, IoT Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex IoT Development programme in the Energy & Utilities space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Technology strategy that aligned our board, our CTO, and our engineering team for the first time

Tobias Lindemann / Leiter Digitalisierung - Lindemann Industrie GmbH
Verified
Jan 25, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
3.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Consulting
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationDec 2024 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Leiter Digitalisierung at Lindemann Industrie GmbH I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Aerospace & Defense operations in Berlin, Germany. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IT Consulting capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IT Consulting, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their IT Consulting approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Aerospace & Defense contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Berlin, Germany and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the IT Consulting work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Aerospace & Defense network — in both cases to peers facing IT Consulting challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.1
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.4

FAQs

How do I actually get a real proposal out of Red Rabbits AS instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Red Rabbits AS a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development, App Marketing, Crypto Exchange Development and Mobile App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Will Red Rabbits AS sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Red Rabbits AS, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Can I just hire developers from Red Rabbits AS to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Red Rabbits AS, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Would Red Rabbits AS be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Red Rabbits AS tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services, and its listed capabilities span Web Development, App Marketing, Crypto Exchange Development and Mobile App Development.
Can Red Rabbits AS take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Red Rabbits AS — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services, and it has been operating since 2009.
What's actually in Red Rabbits AS's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Red Rabbits AS commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development, App Marketing, Crypto Exchange Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services.
Has Red Rabbits AS actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Red Rabbits AS — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services, and its listed capabilities span Web Development, App Marketing, Crypto Exchange Development and Mobile App Development.
Does Red Rabbits AS only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Red Rabbits AS isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Red Rabbits AS to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Red Rabbits AS, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Web Development, App Marketing, Crypto Exchange Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Nonprofit & NGO, Gaming & Gambling, Insurance, Energy & Utilities and Legal Services.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies