Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

ResoNova

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (6 reviews)
+14046184142 info@resonova.com Visit Website

About ResoNova

ResoNova is a leading Blockchain development company. The decentralized structure of blockchain technology provides a vast array of powerful and simple solutions which were never before thought possible. They empower and launch new blockchain ventures and provide established businesses with the competitive advantages of the blockchain. They empower and start new blockchain tests and equip established businesses with the competitive advantages of the blockchain.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Blockchain Development Cryptocurrency Wallet Development

Industries Served

Construction Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Media & Entertainment Logistics & Supply Chain Real Estate Automotive

ResoNova Reviews

Write a Review

Sales visibility we had been requesting for three years, delivered in fourteen weeks

Zara Hussain / Head of Technology - Ravi Digital Agency
Verified
Jan 01, 2026

Project summary: The transition to EV had created demand for dealer network management capabilities our existing system was not designed to support. A targeted rebuild was the agreed path forward.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Technology at Ravi Digital Agency I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Automotive operations in Lahore, Pakistan. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Automotive market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The CRM Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily CRM Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their CRM Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Automotive contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Automotive sector looking for CRM Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2016
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.5/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.3

FAQs

Would ResoNova be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like ResoNova tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
What kind of software work does ResoNova take on?
ResoNova typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development.
Does ResoNova actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, ResoNova included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Media & Entertainment, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Construction, Real Estate and Automotive, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What does ResoNova's actual delivery process look like week to week?
ResoNova generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Has ResoNova actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like ResoNova — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Can ResoNova take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like ResoNova — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, and it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Media & Entertainment, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Construction, Real Estate and Automotive.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like ResoNova to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as ResoNova, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2016.
What happens with ResoNova after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, ResoNova typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development.
What's actually in ResoNova's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but ResoNova commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Blockchain Development and Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, and it has been operating since 2016.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with ResoNova?
Most companies structured like ResoNova give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2016.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies