Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Resound

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+14803514857 hello@resoundcreative.com Visit Website

About Resound

They believe that each person and organization has a powerful story to tell, and the world is waiting to hear it. People shouldn’t slap on a new “look” and make others think they’re someone else. They provide full digital service presenting driven by a focus on excellent client experience by joining the external perspective, an explorative manner and know-how in business design, user experience, and imaginative technology.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development

Industries Served

Agriculture Manufacturing Environmental Services Automotive Legal Services Retail & E-commerce Information Technology

Resound Reviews

Write a Review

Project execution that matched the proposal in every dimension that mattered

Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud AB
Verified
Jan 16, 2026

Project summary: Customer expectations had reset and our conversion funnel data showed precisely where we were losing them. We needed a commerce platform capable of delivering the experience our competitors already had.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryRetail & E-commerce
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJun 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Technology Officer at Nordic Cloud AB I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Retail & E-commerce operations in Stockholm, Sweden. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Embedded Systems Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Embedded Systems Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Retail & E-commerce experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Machine learning in production that the board could see working within eight weeks

Aoife Brennan / VP of Product Engineering - Emerald Digital Ltd
Verified
Jan 13, 2026

Project summary: Rapid growth had created a skills gap on the platform engineering side of our business. We needed an experienced partner to close that gap while our internal team scaled, without compromising quality or timeline.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryInformation Technology
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Emerald Digital Ltd is an established Information Technology organisation headquartered in Dublin, UK. My role as VP of Product Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Information Technology market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The AI & Machine Learning requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full AI & Machine Learning lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Information Technology sector had used them for a comparable AI & Machine Learning engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, AI & Machine Learning depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Dublin, UK and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the AI & Machine Learning work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Information Technology network — in both cases to peers facing AI & Machine Learning challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.0
Communication
4.1

FAQs

Does Resound actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Resound included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing, and it has been operating since 2009.
Has Resound actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Resound — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2009.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Resound instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Resound a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Can Resound take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Resound — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Will Resound sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Resound, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What's actually in Resound's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Resound commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Is Resound more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Resound is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing.
Would Resound be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Resound tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Resound?
Most companies structured like Resound give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
Can I just hire developers from Resound to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Resound, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Information Technology, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce, Automotive and Manufacturing, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies