getListingXYZ SoftwareHut Reviews
Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

SoftwareHut

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+46851972154 hello@softwarehut.com Visit Website

About SoftwareHut

Since 2015, SoftwareHut has operated as a technology services provider. SoftwareHut focuses on Mobile App Development. The company operates with a team of 50 - 249 professionals. Typical hourly rates run around $50 - $99/hr, with an average project cost near $2,500,000. Overall, SoftwareHut is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Enterprise App Development

Industries Served

Automotive Retail & E-commerce Information Technology Mining & Metals Insurance Media & Entertainment

SoftwareHut Reviews

Write a Review

The kind of web build that makes you wonder why you tolerated the old site for so long

Takashi Morimoto / Director of IT Strategy - Sakura Digital KK
Verified
Apr 04, 2026

Project summary: Our actuarial models had outgrown the reporting infrastructure feeding them. Data latency was introducing risk into pricing decisions that the business had decided it could no longer accept.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
3.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryInsurance
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Sakura Digital KK operates in the Insurance sector with headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. In my role as Director of IT Strategy I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Insurance market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Web Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Web Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Tokyo, Japan and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

The outcome we specified, delivered the way we needed it, by people we would hire again

Maja Söderström / Head of Product Engineering - Scandia Digital AB
Verified
Feb 20, 2026

Project summary: Our audience data was fragmented across eight tools with no single identity layer. Personalisation had become impossible without first solving the data foundation.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Scandia Digital AB is an established Media & Entertainment organisation headquartered in Gothenburg, Sweden. My role as Head of Product Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Low-Code / No-Code Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Media & Entertainment sector looking for Low-Code / No-Code Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2015
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.1

FAQs

What does SoftwareHut's actual delivery process look like week to week?
SoftwareHut generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in Sweden, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Would SoftwareHut be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like SoftwareHut tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development, Enterprise App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Retail & E-commerce, Information Technology, Mining & Metals and Insurance.
Can I just hire developers from SoftwareHut to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like SoftwareHut, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has served clients in Sweden, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
Is SoftwareHut more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where SoftwareHut is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in Sweden, and its listed capabilities span UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development, Enterprise App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
What kinds of industries has SoftwareHut actually built for?
SoftwareHut has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Retail & E-commerce, Information Technology, Mining & Metals and Insurance.
Does SoftwareHut actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, SoftwareHut included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Retail & E-commerce, Information Technology, Mining & Metals and Insurance, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
Will SoftwareHut sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including SoftwareHut, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in Sweden, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What kind of software work does SoftwareHut take on?
SoftwareHut typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development, Enterprise App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
What happens with SoftwareHut after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, SoftwareHut typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span UI-UX Design, Mobile App Development, Enterprise App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
What makes SoftwareHut worth considering over other options?
What tends to set SoftwareHut apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2015, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies