About Tech9
Since 2015, Tech9 has operated as a technology services provider. Tech9 focuses on Web Development and Mobile App Development. Tech9 employs 10 - 49 people. Typical hourly rates run around $50 - $99/hr, with an average project cost near $5,000,000. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Tech9.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Services
Industries Served
Tech9 Reviews
Write a ReviewSEO work that moved our primary keywords from page two to position three in five months
Tobias Lindemann / Leiter Digitalisierung - Lindemann Industrie GmbHJan 30, 2026
Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.
Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.
Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before
Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons
Questions & Answers
Analytics infrastructure that made our data science team genuinely productive for the first time
Shreya Krishnaswamy / VP of Product - Luminar Tech Pvt LtdJan 22, 2026
Project summary: Our mobile app had a 2.9-star average review score. The two themes in every negative review were speed and booking flow complexity — both were solvable with the right engineering partner.
What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.
Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable
Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it