Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

ThinkPower

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (6 reviews)
+886287511610 service@thinkpower.com.tw Visit Website

About ThinkPower

They initialize their client care program by listening carefully to their clients, explaining the information given, full customer satisfaction is always their first priority. They commit to delivering best value at a fair cost, with their state-of-the-art technique, helping customers with best construction management software solutions. Their powerful, leading business technology makes them the industry leader in developing, distributing and optimizing content.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Big Data

Industries Served

Mining & Metals Automotive Government & Public Sector Real Estate Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Healthcare

ThinkPower Reviews

Write a Review

A partnership that began with a single project and earned a place on our preferred vendor list

Victoria Haines / Chief Product Officer - Solaris Media Group
Verified
Jan 11, 2026

Project summary: Integration between our clinic management system and our patient-facing app had been a recurring failure point. We needed an engineering partner who could own the integration layer end to end.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryHealthcare
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJun 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Solaris Media Group operates in the Healthcare sector with headquarters in Los Angeles, USA. In my role as Chief Product Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Low-Code / No-Code Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Low-Code / No-Code Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2005
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.6/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.9
Communication
4.4

FAQs

What should I expect to pay to work with ThinkPower?
What ThinkPower charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, ThinkPower's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $2500000+.
What happens with ThinkPower after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, ThinkPower typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Mining & Metals, Government & Public Sector, Real Estate, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Healthcare and Automotive, and it has served clients in Taiwan.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with ThinkPower?
Most businesses reach ThinkPower through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in Taiwan, and it has been operating since 2005.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of ThinkPower instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving ThinkPower a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in Taiwan, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like ThinkPower to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as ThinkPower, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Big Data, Custom Software Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Mobile App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What makes ThinkPower worth considering over other options?
What tends to set ThinkPower apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2005, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What's actually in ThinkPower's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but ThinkPower commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in Taiwan, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with ThinkPower?
Most companies structured like ThinkPower give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has served clients in Taiwan, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Has ThinkPower actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like ThinkPower — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Mining & Metals, Government & Public Sector, Real Estate, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Healthcare and Automotive, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies