Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Tink

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (6 reviews)
+15148660995 montreal@tink.ca Visit Website

About Tink

They stay informed of new and emerging trends: they analyze them to know their relevance and determine how they can be useful to you. Their clients to develop appropriate, sustainable digital ecosystems and keep them up to date. Their strategy and consulting team work with you to know your demands and determine the best way to achieve your business objectives.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design SEO Content Marketing

Industries Served

Automotive Nonprofit & NGO Healthcare Advertising & Marketing Mining & Metals Manufacturing

Tink Reviews

Write a Review

A partnership that began with a single project and earned a place on our preferred vendor list

Liselotte Bakker / Head of Platform Engineering - Harbour Digital BV
Verified
Mar 16, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Platform Engineering at Harbour Digital BV I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Manufacturing operations in Utrecht, Netherlands. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Low-Code / No-Code Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Low-Code / No-Code Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Manufacturing network — in both cases to peers facing Low-Code / No-Code Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 1995
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Client Rating 4.8/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.8
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.8

FAQs

What makes Tink worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Tink apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 1995, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What kinds of industries has Tink actually built for?
Tink has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Automotive, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Advertising & Marketing, Nonprofit & NGO and Mining & Metals.
Is Tink more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Tink is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in Canada, and its listed capabilities span Content Marketing, Mobile App Development, SEO, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Tink to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Tink, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has served clients in Canada, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
What does Tink's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Tink generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Advertising & Marketing, Nonprofit & NGO and Mining & Metals, and it has served clients in Canada.
What kind of software work does Tink take on?
Tink typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Content Marketing, Mobile App Development, SEO, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Tink?
Most companies structured like Tink give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Advertising & Marketing, Nonprofit & NGO and Mining & Metals, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Tink?
Most businesses reach Tink through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in Canada, and it has been operating since 1995.
Has Tink actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Tink — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Advertising & Marketing, Nonprofit & NGO and Mining & Metals, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Tink instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Tink a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Advertising & Marketing, Nonprofit & NGO and Mining & Metals, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies