Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Tiny Frog Technologies

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+16192027542 info@tinyfrog.com Visit Website

About Tiny Frog Technologies

TinyFrog Technologies is a San-Diego-based web agency, specializing in WordPress web design and development, secured hosting and maintenance, and search engine optimization. They select technology based on the requirements. They are design, writing and marketing specialists who care about your brand.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Custom Software Development

Industries Served

Advertising & Marketing Nonprofit & NGO Human Resources Government & Public Sector Energy & Utilities Real Estate Media & Entertainment

Tiny Frog Technologies Reviews

Write a Review

Technically rigorous, commercially grounded, and a genuine pleasure to work with

Gustavo Ferreira / VP of Technology - Amazônia Digital Ltda
Verified
Jan 14, 2026

Project summary: Digital-first buyer behaviour had made our property search experience a genuine competitive liability. We needed it to match the quality of the portfolio it was representing.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustryReal Estate
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMay 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Amazônia Digital Ltda operates in the Real Estate sector with headquarters in São Paulo, Brazil. In my role as VP of Technology I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end POS System Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Real Estate experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex POS System Development programme in the Real Estate space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Data engineering quality that will support our growth for years without a rebuild

Imogen Tanner / Head of Engineering - Outback Data Solutions
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: Our audience data was fragmented across eight tools with no single identity layer. Personalisation had become impossible without first solving the data foundation.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeData & Analytics
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Outback Data Solutions operates in the Media & Entertainment sector with headquarters in Melbourne, Australia. In my role as Head of Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Data & Analytics delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Media & Entertainment network — in both cases to peers facing Data & Analytics challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2003
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.8
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.5

FAQs

What should I expect to pay to work with Tiny Frog Technologies?
What Tiny Frog Technologies charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Tiny Frog Technologies's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Tiny Frog Technologies to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Tiny Frog Technologies, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, VR App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Development and AR App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Will Tiny Frog Technologies sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Tiny Frog Technologies, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Energy & Utilities, Real Estate, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Government & Public Sector, and its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, VR App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Development and AR App Development.
Can I just hire developers from Tiny Frog Technologies to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Tiny Frog Technologies, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, VR App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Development and AR App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Roughly how long does a project with Tiny Frog Technologies take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Tiny Frog Technologies can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does Tiny Frog Technologies only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Tiny Frog Technologies isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What's actually in Tiny Frog Technologies's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Tiny Frog Technologies commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, VR App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Development and AR App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Energy & Utilities, Real Estate, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Government & Public Sector.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Tiny Frog Technologies?
Most businesses reach Tiny Frog Technologies through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Energy & Utilities, Real Estate, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Government & Public Sector, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What does Tiny Frog Technologies's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Tiny Frog Technologies generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, VR App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Development and AR App Development, and it has been operating since 2003.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies