Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

TRooTech Business Solutions

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+91 079 29706830 sales@trootech.com Visit Website

About TRooTech Business Solutions

TRooTech is among the best software development houses, catering to the unique requirement of clients based in the U.S., the U.K., Australia, and other parts of the world. We have been in the business for over 8 years and have established authority in terms of quality web app and mobile app development. We hold expertise in the development of startup solutions and enterprise solutions.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development IoT App Development Web Design Enterprise Application Management AI Development Mobile App Design Blockchain Development Web App Development

Industries Served

Healthcare Manufacturing Travel & Hospitality Events & Event Management Gaming & Gambling Energy & Utilities Government & Public Sector

TRooTech Business Solutions Reviews

Write a Review

Distributed ledger that finally solved a trust problem we had spent three years arguing about

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 20, 2026

Project summary: Grid modernisation funding required us to demonstrate demand-response capability. The machine learning models existed on paper; we needed an engineering partner to build and productionise them.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd operates in the Energy & Utilities sector with headquarters in Singapore. In my role as CTO I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Blockchain Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Blockchain Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Energy & Utilities network — in both cases to peers facing Blockchain Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Technically rigorous, commercially grounded, and a genuine pleasure to work with

Fatima Al-Suwaidi / Head of Digital Strategy - Gulf FinTech Holdings
Verified
Jan 12, 2026

Project summary: Cross-agency data sharing had been blocked by incompatible systems for four years. A secure integration platform was the prerequisite for every transformation initiative in our roadmap.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJan 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Gulf FinTech Holdings, a growth-stage Government & Public Sector business based in Abu Dhabi, UAE. As Head of Digital Strategy my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Low-Code / No-Code Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Government & Public Sector experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Low-Code / No-Code Development programme in the Government & Public Sector space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Does TRooTech Business Solutions actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, TRooTech Business Solutions included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Events & Event Management, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare and Energy & Utilities, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Will TRooTech Business Solutions sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including TRooTech Business Solutions, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in India, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Events & Event Management, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare and Energy & Utilities.
Has TRooTech Business Solutions actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like TRooTech Business Solutions — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Enterprise Application Management, IoT App Development and Mobile App Design, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Is TRooTech Business Solutions more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where TRooTech Business Solutions is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Enterprise Application Management, IoT App Development and Mobile App Design, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of TRooTech Business Solutions instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving TRooTech Business Solutions a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in India, and it has been operating since 2014.
Does TRooTech Business Solutions only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
TRooTech Business Solutions isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including India, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can I just hire developers from TRooTech Business Solutions to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like TRooTech Business Solutions, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has served clients in India, and its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Enterprise Application Management, IoT App Development and Mobile App Design.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with TRooTech Business Solutions?
Most companies structured like TRooTech Business Solutions give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Enterprise Application Management, IoT App Development and Mobile App Design, and it has been operating since 2014.
What does TRooTech Business Solutions's actual delivery process look like week to week?
TRooTech Business Solutions generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Events & Event Management, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare and Energy & Utilities, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies