Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Ultraviolet App

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.7/5 (7 reviews)
+3905231880964 info@ultravioletapp.it Visit Website

About Ultraviolet App

They are a known team that integrates high professional skills, a vast experience in the market and a strong creativity. They develop high quality & unique custom mobile app solutions with specific consideration to developing useful & interesting user interfaces to give a pleasant user experience. They design and develop best mobile apps with complicated navigation & graphic patterns.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development IoT App Development UI-UX Design Web Design

Industries Served

Energy & Utilities Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Nonprofit & NGO Human Resources Retail & E-commerce Automotive Food & Beverage

Ultraviolet App Reviews

Write a Review

Security team that communicated findings clearly to non-technical stakeholders — genuinely rare

Vikram Srinivasan / Head of Platform - Cascade EdTech Solutions
Verified
Feb 06, 2026

Project summary: The transition to EV had created demand for dealer network management capabilities our existing system was not designed to support. A targeted rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Cascade EdTech Solutions, a growth-stage Automotive business based in Chennai, India. As Head of Platform my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Cybersecurity capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Cybersecurity lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Cybersecurity work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Cybersecurity programme in the Automotive space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Mobile experience so polished that users have been sending us compliments

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Feb 01, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeMobile App Development
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJun 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd, a growth-stage Food & Beverage business based in Singapore. As CTO my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Mobile App Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Mobile App Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Food & Beverage contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Singapore and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.7/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.9
Communication
4.5

FAQs

Can Ultraviolet App take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Ultraviolet App — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has served clients in Italy, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What kinds of industries has Ultraviolet App actually built for?
Ultraviolet App has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Retail & E-commerce, Automotive, Nonprofit & NGO, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Human Resources.
What kind of software work does Ultraviolet App take on?
Ultraviolet App typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.
Does Ultraviolet App actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Ultraviolet App included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has served clients in Italy, and it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Automotive, Nonprofit & NGO, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Human Resources.
What happens with Ultraviolet App after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Ultraviolet App typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Automotive, Nonprofit & NGO, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Human Resources, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What makes Ultraviolet App worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Ultraviolet App apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2013, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Will Ultraviolet App sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Ultraviolet App, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in Italy, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Can I just hire developers from Ultraviolet App to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Ultraviolet App, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Automotive, Nonprofit & NGO, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Human Resources.
What's actually in Ultraviolet App's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Ultraviolet App commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Automotive, Nonprofit & NGO, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Human Resources, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What should I expect to pay to work with Ultraviolet App?
What Ultraviolet App charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Ultraviolet App's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $25000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies