Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

UruIT

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+13104092021 hello@uruit.com Visit Website

About UruIT

UruIT is an awarded software development company with offices in Colombia, Uruguay and incorporated in Los Angeles, California. Our mobile app development team design and build applications for success, taking the user experience into account while helping our clients to release faster and better.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Cross Platform App Development iOS App Development

Industries Served

Media & Entertainment Manufacturing Legal Services Fashion & Apparel Education Events & Event Management Energy & Utilities

UruIT Reviews

Write a Review

The kind of web build that makes you wonder why you tolerated the old site for so long

Jia Hui Tan / VP of Engineering - RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryEvents & Event Management
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd, a growth-stage Events & Event Management business based in Singapore. As VP of Engineering my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Web Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Web Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Events & Event Management sector looking for Web Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

End-to-end quality programme that halved our post-release incident rate inside three months

Elliot Thorne / Managing Director, Tech - Redwood Capital Advisors
Verified
Jan 02, 2026

Project summary: Our field service management system had not been updated significantly in six years. Rising technician count and increasing job complexity had exposed every one of its limitations.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Redwood Capital Advisors operates in the Energy & Utilities sector with headquarters in San Francisco, USA. In my role as Managing Director, Tech I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Quality Assurance & Testing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Quality Assurance & Testing programme in the Energy & Utilities space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.1
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.4

FAQs

Has UruIT actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like UruIT — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Education, Media & Entertainment, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing and Events & Event Management, and it has been operating since 2007.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with UruIT?
Most companies structured like UruIT give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Can UruIT take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like UruIT — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Education, Media & Entertainment, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing and Events & Event Management, and its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of UruIT instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving UruIT a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Can I just hire developers from UruIT to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like UruIT, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Education, Media & Entertainment, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing and Events & Event Management, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Will UruIT sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including UruIT, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Education, Media & Entertainment, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing and Events & Event Management, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Is UruIT more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where UruIT is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in Uruguay, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What should I expect to pay to work with UruIT?
What UruIT charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, UruIT's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $50000+.
What kind of software work does UruIT take on?
UruIT typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include iOS App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies