About ViaForge
ViaForge has been in business since 2012, delivering technology projects for clients. The company's main offerings are Digital Marketing. With 2 - 9 people on staff, ViaForge can take on projects of varying size. Typical hourly rates run around $100 - $149/hr, with an average project cost near $2,500,000. Overall, ViaForge is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Services
Industries Served
ViaForge Reviews
Write a ReviewIT partner embedded deeply enough to understand our business, not just our ticket queue
Elliot Thorne / Managing Director, Tech - Redwood Capital AdvisorsFeb 07, 2026
Project summary: A content deal had given us the rights to a major catalogue but our delivery infrastructure could not stream it reliably at scale. We needed a cloud-native video platform in under six months.
We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.
Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout
Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons
Questions & Answers
Outsourced IT that improved both the outcome and the cost line simultaneously
Cameron Aldrich / Head of Digital Operations - Northstar Logistics CorpJan 25, 2026
Project summary: Grid modernisation funding required us to demonstrate demand-response capability. The machine learning models existed on paper; we needed an engineering partner to build and productionise them.
Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.
Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable
Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it