Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

WebDex

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.1/5 (7 reviews)
+436764110022 office@webdex.at Visit Website

About WebDex

They think, with increasing market of mobile enabling technologies & the necessary to give services in the most common & most human form, a mobile app is a comprehensive choice to describe your perception to the end users and enterprises. They design & code by directing on quality & maintainability. A team of Webdex works iteratively & use code frequently.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Cross Platform App Development Web Design

Industries Served

Gaming & Gambling Legal Services Fashion & Apparel Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Construction Food & Beverage

WebDex Reviews

Write a Review

Cloud migration completed without the chaos our previous attempt had produced

Gustavo Ferreira / VP of Technology - Amazônia Digital Ltda
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeCloud Services
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJun 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Technology at Amazônia Digital Ltda I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Food & Beverage operations in São Paulo, Brazil. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cloud Services delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Food & Beverage network — in both cases to peers facing Cloud Services challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Checkout redesign that improved completed transaction rate from the first day in production

Omar Al-Farsi / Chief Technology Officer - Falcon Digital Ventures
Verified
Jan 02, 2026

Project summary: Serialisation requirements under new traceability legislation had a compliance deadline. Our supply chain system required targeted development to meet it — generalist knowledge was not sufficient.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
3.5
Schedule
3.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJun 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Falcon Digital Ventures, a growth-stage Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology business based in Dubai, UAE. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant E-commerce Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was E-commerce Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology network — in both cases to peers facing E-commerce Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2000
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.1/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
3.9
Cost
4.0
Communication
4.1

FAQs

Does WebDex actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, WebDex included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like WebDex to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as WebDex, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What should I expect to pay to work with WebDex?
What WebDex charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, WebDex's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $50000+.
What kinds of industries has WebDex actually built for?
WebDex has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Gaming & Gambling, Fashion & Apparel, Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Construction and Legal Services.
Does WebDex only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
WebDex isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Austria, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What happens with WebDex after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, WebDex typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has served clients in Austria, and its listed capabilities span Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.
What's actually in WebDex's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but WebDex commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Fashion & Apparel, Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Construction and Legal Services, and it has served clients in Austria.
Can I just hire developers from WebDex to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like WebDex, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Fashion & Apparel, Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Construction and Legal Services, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What does WebDex's actual delivery process look like week to week?
WebDex generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Cross Platform App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in Austria.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies