Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

eTeam Inc.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+12138398500 hello@eteam.io Visit Website

About eTeam Inc.

We've been building customer software for our clients, partners and our own products since 2009. Our team includes experts in JavaScript, Python and Ruby plus engineers with AWS certification. From UX design, project management to development and delivery, we’ve got the complete life-cycle of your custom software, native app or webapp covered.

Our approach and dedication to agile, iterative development with complete transparency allows us to bring decades of combined experience to new startups and the fresh innovation of a small team to enterprise projects. Whether you're looking for a dedicated team to work within your company or for a partner to provide a complete solution, eTeam is ready to work with you.

American Entrepreneurship + Ukrainian Engineering = Great Software

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design E-commerce Development Data Science & Big Data DevOps & Cloud

Industries Served

Information Technology Retail & E-commerce Aerospace & Defense Real Estate Human Resources Nonprofit & NGO Sports & Fitness

eTeam Inc. Reviews

Write a Review

Headless commerce architecture that gave our content and marketing teams genuine independence

Aarav Mehta / Chief Data Officer - Zenith FinServ Ltd
Verified
Jan 07, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryNonprofit & NGO
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Zenith FinServ Ltd, a growth-stage Nonprofit & NGO business based in Bangalore, India. As Chief Data Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Nonprofit & NGO segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The E-commerce Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full E-commerce Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the E-commerce Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex E-commerce Development programme in the Nonprofit & NGO space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

The outcome we specified, delivered the way we needed it, by people we would hire again

Flynn Buchanan / GM of Technology - Pacific Rim Commerce Group
Verified
Jan 02, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustrySports & Fitness
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJan 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Pacific Rim Commerce Group, a growth-stage Sports & Fitness business based in Perth, Australia. As GM of Technology my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our POS System Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full POS System Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their POS System Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Sports & Fitness contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Sports & Fitness sector looking for POS System Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.3

FAQs

What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like eTeam Inc. to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as eTeam Inc., it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce.
What's actually in eTeam Inc.'s technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but eTeam Inc. commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce.
Is eTeam Inc. more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where eTeam Inc. is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with eTeam Inc.?
Most businesses reach eTeam Inc. through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with eTeam Inc.?
Most companies structured like eTeam Inc. give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
What kinds of industries has eTeam Inc. actually built for?
eTeam Inc. has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce.
What happens with eTeam Inc. after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, eTeam Inc. typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What kind of software work does eTeam Inc. take on?
eTeam Inc. typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
Can I just hire developers from eTeam Inc. to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like eTeam Inc., where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Can eTeam Inc. take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like eTeam Inc. — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Information Technology, Sports & Fitness, Aerospace & Defense, Human Resources and Retail & E-commerce, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies