Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Flatorb Inc

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+940115990501 contact@flatorb.com Visit Website

About Flatorb Inc

Flatorb was established in 2008 in Washington DC USA and provides comprehensive engineering, automation, energy saving, and web application development services to all sizes of businesses and organizations around the world. Solutions they have developed has been implemented in over 100 countries serving millions of people.
Since their establishment in Sri Lanka, they have brought a new era of automation and industrial technology to the country.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development iPhone App Development Crypto Exchange Development Ethereum Blockchain Smart Contracts Audits

Industries Served

Sports & Fitness Education Telecommunications Construction Real Estate Automotive

Flatorb Inc Reviews

Write a Review

Complete rebuild that our marketing team can now manage without engineering tickets

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Feb 26, 2026

Project summary: Our agents were spending more time managing data across disconnected systems than managing relationships. We needed a unified platform to give them that time back.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryReal Estate
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Northumbria FinTech Ltd, a growth-stage Real Estate business based in Edinburgh, UK. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Web Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Web Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Web Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Real Estate contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Real Estate experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Real Estate network — in both cases to peers facing Web Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Smart contract implementation rigorous enough to satisfy both our legal and security teams

Nathan Prescott / VP of Technology - Ironclad Insurance Group
Verified
Jan 20, 2026

Project summary: The transition to EV had created demand for dealer network management capabilities our existing system was not designed to support. A targeted rebuild was the agreed path forward.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMay 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Technology at Ironclad Insurance Group I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Automotive operations in New York, USA. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Blockchain Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Blockchain Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Blockchain Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Blockchain Development programme in the Automotive space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2000
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.3

FAQs

What happens with Flatorb Inc after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Flatorb Inc typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Automotive, Real Estate, Education, Sports & Fitness and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Is Flatorb Inc more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Flatorb Inc is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Automotive, Real Estate, Education, Sports & Fitness and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What kinds of industries has Flatorb Inc actually built for?
Flatorb Inc has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Construction, Automotive, Real Estate, Education, Sports & Fitness and Telecommunications.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Flatorb Inc?
Most businesses reach Flatorb Inc through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Smart Contracts Audits, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization and Chat Bots & AI Development, and it has been operating since 2000.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Flatorb Inc to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Flatorb Inc, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Smart Contracts Audits, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization and Chat Bots & AI Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Has Flatorb Inc actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Flatorb Inc — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Smart Contracts Audits, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization and Chat Bots & AI Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Can I just hire developers from Flatorb Inc to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Flatorb Inc, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Smart Contracts Audits, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization and Chat Bots & AI Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does Flatorb Inc only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Flatorb Inc isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What should I expect to pay to work with Flatorb Inc?
What Flatorb Inc charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Flatorb Inc's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $5000000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies