Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

HIRUN Technology Company Limited

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
+66 932388336 sales@hiruntec.com Visit Website

About HIRUN Technology Company Limited

They have born with an idea to produce tailor-made solutions to the market. Here, they know customer needs and challenges in the business environment. They have start-up enthusiasm with experienced mentors to cater effective, timely deliveries with maintained quality. It is one of the best mobile app development company.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Internet of Things E-commerce Development

Industries Served

Retail & E-commerce Education Insurance Manufacturing Financial Services Construction Environmental Services

HIRUN Technology Company Limited Reviews

Write a Review

Architecture review that saved us from a vendor decision we would have regretted for years

Flynn Buchanan / GM of Technology - Pacific Rim Commerce Group
Verified
Jan 12, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIT Consulting
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Pacific Rim Commerce Group is an established Construction organisation headquartered in Perth, Australia. My role as GM of Technology covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Construction market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The IT Consulting requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IT Consulting delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Construction sector looking for IT Consulting expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Monetisation system integrated in a way that players accepted rather than resented

Niamh O'Sullivan / Director of Product - Munster Digital Ltd
Verified
Jan 08, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustryEnvironmental Services
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Munster Digital Ltd, a growth-stage Environmental Services business based in Limerick, Ireland. As Director of Product my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Game Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Game Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Environmental Services sector looking for Game Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2017
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.4

FAQs

What happens with HIRUN Technology Company Limited after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, HIRUN Technology Company Limited typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Insurance, Retail & E-commerce, Construction, Environmental Services and Manufacturing, and it has served clients in Thailand.
What makes HIRUN Technology Company Limited worth considering over other options?
What tends to set HIRUN Technology Company Limited apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2017, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What kinds of industries has HIRUN Technology Company Limited actually built for?
HIRUN Technology Company Limited has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Financial Services, Insurance, Retail & E-commerce, Construction, Environmental Services and Manufacturing.
What's actually in HIRUN Technology Company Limited's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but HIRUN Technology Company Limited commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has been operating since 2017.
Has HIRUN Technology Company Limited actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like HIRUN Technology Company Limited — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Insurance, Retail & E-commerce, Construction, Environmental Services and Manufacturing, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
Does HIRUN Technology Company Limited actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, HIRUN Technology Company Limited included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has served clients in Thailand, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like HIRUN Technology Company Limited to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as HIRUN Technology Company Limited, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has served clients in Thailand, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
Would HIRUN Technology Company Limited be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like HIRUN Technology Company Limited tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has served clients in Thailand, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Does HIRUN Technology Company Limited only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
HIRUN Technology Company Limited isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Thailand, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with HIRUN Technology Company Limited?
Most companies structured like HIRUN Technology Company Limited give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies