getListingXYZ Lopif Software, Inc Reviews
Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Lopif Software, Inc

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (7 reviews)
N/A contact@lopif.com Visit Website

About Lopif Software, Inc

Businesses looking for a reliable technology partner often consider Lopif Software, Inc. Their core services include Web Development. The company operates with a team of 2 - 9 professionals. The average project on record costs around $5,000,000. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Lopif Software, Inc.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Chat Bots & AI Development Web Design

Industries Served

Nonprofit & NGO Human Resources Information Technology Aerospace & Defense Financial Services Events & Event Management

Lopif Software, Inc Reviews

Write a Review

A digital marketing partner who optimised for business outcomes, not vanity metrics

Gustavo Ferreira / VP of Technology - Amazônia Digital Ltda
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Evolving open banking obligations required us to rebuild our API layer from the ground up. The architecture needed to be compliant by default, not bolted on after the fact.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Technology at Amazônia Digital Ltda I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Financial Services operations in São Paulo, Brazil. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Digital Marketing delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Digital Marketing work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

VR training that cut certification time and is genuinely preferred by our trainees

Aarav Mehta / Chief Data Officer - Zenith FinServ Ltd
Verified
Jan 04, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryEvents & Event Management
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJun 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Zenith FinServ Ltd, a growth-stage Events & Event Management business based in Bangalore, India. As Chief Data Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our AR/VR Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end AR/VR Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their AR/VR Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Events & Event Management contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AR/VR Development programme in the Events & Event Management space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.6/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.4

FAQs

What happens with Lopif Software, Inc after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Lopif Software, Inc typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services.
What does Lopif Software, Inc's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Lopif Software, Inc generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services, and it has served clients in USA.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Lopif Software, Inc?
Most businesses reach Lopif Software, Inc through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services.
Can Lopif Software, Inc take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Lopif Software, Inc — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services, and it has been operating since 2013.
Has Lopif Software, Inc actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Lopif Software, Inc — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Lopif Software, Inc to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Lopif Software, Inc, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
What should I expect to pay to work with Lopif Software, Inc?
What Lopif Software, Inc charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Lopif Software, Inc's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
Can I just hire developers from Lopif Software, Inc to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Lopif Software, Inc, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services, and its listed capabilities span Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
What kinds of industries has Lopif Software, Inc actually built for?
Lopif Software, Inc has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Events & Event Management, Human Resources, Nonprofit & NGO, Aerospace & Defense, Information Technology and Financial Services.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies