Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Occura Software

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+250783939827 info@occurasoftware.com Visit Website

About Occura Software

They afford themselves time to know their client’s key aims, market positions and competitive advantages and this preparation helps us develop, manage and maintain a client platform with the experience of an in-house development team, but with the expertise of an outsourcing agent. They will put their passion for good design to work and based on approved wireframes that design all screens.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development SEO Content Marketing Internet Marketing Cloud Solutions

Industries Served

Telecommunications Real Estate Automotive Energy & Utilities Nonprofit & NGO Government & Public Sector Legal Services

Occura Software Reviews

Write a Review

Online store that our fulfilment and finance teams are as happy with as our customers are

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Apr 08, 2026

Project summary: Digital service standards required all citizen-facing applications to meet accessibility and performance benchmarks that our inherited systems failed. Remediation was not viable — we needed a replacement.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd operates in the Government & Public Sector sector with headquarters in Singapore. In my role as CTO I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant E-commerce Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily E-commerce Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Singapore and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex E-commerce Development programme in the Government & Public Sector space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Zero-trust implementation that satisfied our enterprise client security questionnaire first pass

Maja Söderström / Head of Product Engineering - Scandia Digital AB
Verified
Mar 10, 2026

Project summary: Matter management had become a significant overhead for our fee earners. Every hour spent on administration was an hour not spent on billable advisory work — the business case was straightforward.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
3.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryLegal Services
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Product Engineering at Scandia Digital AB I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Legal Services operations in Gothenburg, Sweden. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Cybersecurity, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Legal Services network — in both cases to peers facing Cybersecurity challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.5

FAQs

Does Occura Software actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Occura Software included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What does Occura Software's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Occura Software generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
Will Occura Software sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Occura Software, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in Rwanda, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What makes Occura Software worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Occura Software apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in N/A, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Has Occura Software actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Occura Software — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has served clients in Rwanda, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Can I just hire developers from Occura Software to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Occura Software, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development, and it has served clients in Rwanda.
What's actually in Occura Software's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Occura Software commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development, and it has served clients in Rwanda.
What kind of software work does Occura Software take on?
Occura Software typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development.
Would Occura Software be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Occura Software tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has served clients in Rwanda, and its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Content Marketing, Custom Software Development, Internet Marketing and Mobile App Development.
What kinds of industries has Occura Software actually built for?
Occura Software has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Automotive, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Legal Services, Real Estate and Telecommunications.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies