Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (7 reviews)
+91 87665 97343 info@siddhatech.com Visit Website

About Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd.

Siddhatech is a well-known software development company in Pune, India offering a wide range of services including Web Application Development, Middleware Development and Mobile Application Development. We also offer Smart Contracts Development services and end-to-end Digital Banking Solutions. We have over 10+ years of experience of working on numerous projects for small, medium and large enterprises across the globe. Thus, if you are looking to hire a software developer in India or searching for an offshore software development company, then we at Siddhatech can help you.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Custom Software Development AI Development Hybrid App Development Web App Development

Industries Served

Agriculture Telecommunications Retail & E-commerce Nonprofit & NGO Food & Beverage Environmental Services

Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Reviews

Write a Review

The outcome we specified, delivered the way we needed it, by people we would hire again

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Feb 26, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryEnvironmental Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJun 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd is an established Environmental Services organisation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. My role as VP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Embedded Systems Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Embedded Systems Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Environmental Services contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Dublin, Ireland and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Embedded Systems Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Environmental Services network — in both cases to peers facing Embedded Systems Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

A partnership that began with a single project and earned a place on our preferred vendor list

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Feb 02, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryAgriculture
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Technology Officer at Northumbria FinTech Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Agriculture operations in Edinburgh, UK. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Agriculture market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Low-Code / No-Code Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Agriculture sector looking for Low-Code / No-Code Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2006
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.2/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.3

FAQs

Would Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Custom Software Development, Hybrid App Development, Mobile App Development and Web App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Does Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including India, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What does Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd.'s actual delivery process look like week to week?
Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in India, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Is Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in India, and its listed capabilities span AI Development, Custom Software Development, Hybrid App Development, Mobile App Development and Web App Development.
What makes Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2006, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in India, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.
Will Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd., expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in India, and it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture and Telecommunications.
Has Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Retail & E-commerce, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What kinds of industries has Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. actually built for?
Siddhatech Software Services Pvt. Ltd. has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Retail & E-commerce, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Nonprofit & NGO, Agriculture and Telecommunications.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies