getListingXYZ TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. Reviews
Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

TechTIQ Solutions Ltd.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
+442038841100 techtiquk@gmail.com Visit Website

About TechTIQ Solutions Ltd.

Since 2017, TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. has operated as a technology services provider. Their core services include Web Development. The company operates with a team of 2 - 9 professionals. The average project on record costs around $10,000. Overall, TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Branding E-commerce Development SEO Ionic App Development

Industries Served

Real Estate Advertising & Marketing Environmental Services Gaming & Gambling Government & Public Sector Telecommunications

TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. Reviews

Write a Review

Web platform that turned our digital presence from a cost centre into a revenue driver

Beatriz Cavalcanti / Chief Digital Officer - Cerrado Tech SA
Verified
Feb 19, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationSep 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Cerrado Tech SA, a growth-stage Gaming & Gambling business based in Brasília, Brazil. As Chief Digital Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Web Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Web Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Web Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Gaming & Gambling contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Gaming & Gambling network — in both cases to peers facing Web Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Smart contract implementation rigorous enough to satisfy both our legal and security teams

Clémentine Aubert / Head of Digital Products - Arc-en-Ciel Digital SAS
Verified
Feb 06, 2026

Project summary: Time-to-market for new tariff structures had become a direct competitive disadvantage. Our product configuration layer was the bottleneck and it needed to be modernised as a priority.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationApr 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Arc-en-Ciel Digital SAS is an established Telecommunications organisation headquartered in Bordeaux, France. My role as Head of Digital Products covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Blockchain Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Blockchain Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Telecommunications network — in both cases to peers facing Blockchain Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2017
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Is TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Environmental Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Telecommunications and Government & Public Sector, and it has been operating since 2017.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with TechTIQ Solutions Ltd.?
Most businesses reach TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Environmental Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Telecommunications and Government & Public Sector, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Would TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Does TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Roughly how long does a project with TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. can scale resources based on project urgency.
What should I expect to pay to work with TechTIQ Solutions Ltd.?
What TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, TechTIQ Solutions Ltd.'s typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Has TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Environmental Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Telecommunications and Government & Public Sector, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What kind of software work does TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. take on?
TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Branding, E-commerce Development, Ionic App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.
Can I just hire developers from TechTIQ Solutions Ltd. to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like TechTIQ Solutions Ltd., where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Ionic App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies