Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

TGBS Co.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (7 reviews)
+982141547000 info@tgbsco.com Visit Website

About TGBS Co.

TGBS Co. is the best choice to access thousands of Android applications that bring fun and excitement to your smartphone. They integrate them into fully-fledged business solutions, establishing a strong online presence for your company and maximizing your ROI. They help produce great ideas for life by several models of engagement. Many startups with a unique idea which never make it to market.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development UI-UX Design Internet of Things Social Media Marketing SEO

Industries Served

Fashion & Apparel Travel & Hospitality Insurance Government & Public Sector Healthcare Food & Beverage

TGBS Co. Reviews

Write a Review

The outcome we specified, delivered the way we needed it, by people we would hire again

Bilal Chaudhry / Co-Founder & CTO - Indus Software House
Verified
Jan 13, 2026

Project summary: Remote care had gone from an experiment to a core service line and our technology had not kept pace. We needed a robust, compliant telehealth platform in a timeline that the market would not wait for.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryHealthcare
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Co-Founder & CTO at Indus Software House I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Healthcare operations in Islamabad, Pakistan. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Embedded Systems Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Embedded Systems Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Healthcare sector looking for Embedded Systems Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Custom modules that fit our operational processes rather than forcing us to change them

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationDec 2024 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Northumbria FinTech Ltd operates in the Food & Beverage sector with headquarters in Edinburgh, UK. In my role as Chief Technology Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Food & Beverage market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The ERP Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end ERP Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Food & Beverage sector had used them for a comparable ERP Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, ERP Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Food & Beverage experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the ERP Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex ERP Development programme in the Food & Beverage space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.3/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.4

FAQs

What happens with TGBS Co. after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, TGBS Co. typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What does TGBS Co.'s actual delivery process look like week to week?
TGBS Co. generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage.
What makes TGBS Co. worth considering over other options?
What tends to set TGBS Co. apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2007, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Has TGBS Co. actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like TGBS Co. — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage.
What's actually in TGBS Co.'s technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but TGBS Co. commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in Iran, and it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage.
Roughly how long does a project with TGBS Co. take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, TGBS Co. can scale resources based on project urgency.
What should I expect to pay to work with TGBS Co.?
What TGBS Co. charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, TGBS Co.'s typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $2500000+.
Can TGBS Co. take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like TGBS Co. — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of TGBS Co. instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving TGBS Co. a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Insurance, Travel & Hospitality, Healthcare, Government & Public Sector and Food & Beverage.
Does TGBS Co. actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, TGBS Co. included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies