Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Altoros

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (7 reviews)
+16503957002 N/A Visit Website

About Altoros

Altoros is a global software development company that helps technology companies deliver software products faster and at a lower cost. The assembly lines into large organizations by deploying solutions offered by the Cloud Foundry ecosystem. Altoros customers are among the first to create and monetize application-driven competitive advantages with Cloud Foundry.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Cloud Solutions Cryptocurrency Wallet Development Hyperledger Smart Contracts Development

Industries Served

Real Estate Agriculture Mining & Metals Energy & Utilities Insurance Retail & E-commerce Construction

Altoros Reviews

Write a Review

Smart contract implementation rigorous enough to satisfy both our legal and security teams

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Mar 02, 2026

Project summary: An international expansion required multi-currency, multi-language, and multi-warehouse capabilities that our existing platform could not support without a fundamental re-architecture.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryRetail & E-commerce
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Engineering at Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Retail & E-commerce operations in Dublin, Ireland. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Retail & E-commerce market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Blockchain Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Blockchain Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Dublin, Ireland and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Blockchain Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Blockchain Development programme in the Retail & E-commerce space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

AI models that replaced guesswork with evidence in decisions that matter most

Sabrina Vollmer / Chief Innovation Officer - Rheintal Digital AG
Verified
Jan 03, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationMay 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Rheintal Digital AG is an established Construction organisation headquartered in Düsseldorf, Germany. My role as Chief Innovation Officer covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Construction segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The AI & Machine Learning changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end AI & Machine Learning delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Construction network — in both cases to peers facing AI & Machine Learning challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2001
Employees 250 - 499
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.5/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.5

FAQs

What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Altoros?
Most companies structured like Altoros give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Hyperledger, Mobile App Development and Smart Contracts Development, and it has experience across industries such as Construction, Agriculture, Mining & Metals, Energy & Utilities, Real Estate and Retail & E-commerce.
What should I expect to pay to work with Altoros?
What Altoros charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Altoros's typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Is Altoros more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Altoros is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Hyperledger, Mobile App Development and Smart Contracts Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Altoros instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Altoros a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Hyperledger, Mobile App Development and Smart Contracts Development, and it has experience across industries such as Construction, Agriculture, Mining & Metals, Energy & Utilities, Real Estate and Retail & E-commerce.
Does Altoros only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Altoros isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Altoros actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Altoros included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Agriculture, Mining & Metals, Energy & Utilities, Real Estate and Retail & E-commerce, and its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Hyperledger, Mobile App Development and Smart Contracts Development.
What makes Altoros worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Altoros apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2001, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What happens with Altoros after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Altoros typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Agriculture, Mining & Metals, Energy & Utilities, Real Estate and Retail & E-commerce, and it has served clients in USA.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Altoros?
Most businesses reach Altoros through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 250 - 499 professionals.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Altoros to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Altoros, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Agriculture, Mining & Metals, Energy & Utilities, Real Estate and Retail & E-commerce, and it reports a team size of 250 - 499 professionals.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies