About Attrecto Smartphone Solutions

They provide professional mobile app development and consulting services to the extended Hungarian business. They transform their customers to mobile role-models in their industry. They have experienced developers which build best mobility solution for enterprise and they have built numerous mobile apps. It is one of the best company in Hungary.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Digital Strategy App Marketing

Industries Served

Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Advertising & Marketing Agriculture Logistics & Supply Chain Telecommunications Automotive Fashion & Apparel

Attrecto Smartphone Solutions Reviews

Write a Review

Smart infrastructure project that paid back the investment in under two quarters

Aoife Brennan / VP of Product Engineering - Emerald Digital Ltd
Verified
Mar 13, 2026

Project summary: Our connected vehicle platform needed to handle telemetry data from an expanding EV fleet while supporting over-the-air update orchestration. No off-the-shelf platform handled both requirements well.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Product Engineering at Emerald Digital Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Automotive operations in Dublin, UK. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IoT Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IoT Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Automotive network — in both cases to peers facing IoT Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Zero-trust implementation that satisfied our enterprise client security questionnaire first pass

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Feb 09, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryFashion & Apparel
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationSep 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd operates in the Fashion & Apparel sector with headquarters in Dublin, Ireland. In my role as VP of Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Fashion & Apparel market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Cybersecurity requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Cybersecurity delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Fashion & Apparel sector had used them for a comparable Cybersecurity engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Cybersecurity depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Cybersecurity work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.6/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.9
Communication
4.6

FAQs

How do I actually get a real proposal out of Attrecto Smartphone Solutions instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Attrecto Smartphone Solutions a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Attrecto Smartphone Solutions?
Most businesses reach Attrecto Smartphone Solutions through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Fashion & Apparel, Advertising & Marketing, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Agriculture and Telecommunications.
What makes Attrecto Smartphone Solutions worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Attrecto Smartphone Solutions apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2009, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Can Attrecto Smartphone Solutions take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Attrecto Smartphone Solutions — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Fashion & Apparel, Advertising & Marketing, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Has Attrecto Smartphone Solutions actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Attrecto Smartphone Solutions — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has served clients in Hungary, and it has been operating since 2009.
What happens with Attrecto Smartphone Solutions after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Attrecto Smartphone Solutions typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has served clients in Hungary.
What kinds of industries has Attrecto Smartphone Solutions actually built for?
Attrecto Smartphone Solutions has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Logistics & Supply Chain, Fashion & Apparel, Advertising & Marketing, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Agriculture and Telecommunications.
Will Attrecto Smartphone Solutions sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Attrecto Smartphone Solutions, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Logistics & Supply Chain, Fashion & Apparel, Advertising & Marketing, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Is Attrecto Smartphone Solutions more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Attrecto Smartphone Solutions is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in Hungary, and its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design.