Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

codeparc

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (7 reviews)
+41615118014 info@codeparc.com Visit Website

About codeparc

It is a software development and service company. Their team of experts is engaged helping organizations. Their unique service consultative way, linked with a strong past performance and extremely skilled security professionals & developers make code part the smart choice in the security consulting, developing and implementation arena.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Internet of Things

Industries Served

Media & Entertainment Energy & Utilities Government & Public Sector Sports & Fitness Nonprofit & NGO Gaming & Gambling Construction

codeparc Reviews

Write a Review

AI models that replaced guesswork with evidence in decisions that matter most

Nora Al-Otaibi / VP of Engineering - Salam Digital Solutions
Verified
Jan 03, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
3.5
Schedule
3.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationAug 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As VP of Engineering at Salam Digital Solutions I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Gaming & Gambling operations in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant AI & Machine Learning investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full AI & Machine Learning lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their AI & Machine Learning approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Gaming & Gambling contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the AI & Machine Learning work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Gaming & Gambling sector looking for AI & Machine Learning expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Immersive AR/VR experience that wowed our customers

Michelle Garcia / Director of IT - HealthSystems Corp
Verified
Apr 26, 2025

Project summary: We required a custom platform that would give us a measurable competitive advantage in our market.

From day one, the team felt like an extension of our own organisation. They immersed themselves in our domain, challenged us to think bigger, and delivered a solution that is both technically sound and strategically valuable. The project came in on time and within budget, which is rare for an engagement of this complexity. We are delighted with the outcome and look forward to a long-term partnership.

PROS

Deep technical expertise, professional project management, responsive support, great value

CONS

Initial onboarding took a couple of extra days, but the team hit full stride very quickly

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJan 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a Director of IT-led organisation operating in the Construction sector. My role involves overseeing strategic technology decisions and vendor partnerships. We have been growing steadily and needed a trusted partner to help us scale our digital capabilities.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our primary challenge was modernising our Construction operations through AR/VR Development. Legacy systems were limiting our agility and we needed a solution that could scale with our growth ambitions and integrate with our existing infrastructure.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They delivered a comprehensive AR/VR Development engagement covering requirements analysis, solution architecture, full-cycle development, QA testing, deployment, and post-launch support. The scope was well-defined and executed without scope creep.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their demonstrated expertise in AR/VR Development and a strong portfolio of Construction projects set them apart during our evaluation. The discovery call gave us confidence they truly understood our domain, not just the technology.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Exceptionally well. They ran a structured discovery process, asked insightful questions, and produced a detailed requirements document that captured nuances we hadn't even articulated ourselves. That foundation made the entire project smoother.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. We had a dedicated project manager, weekly status calls, a shared project board, and same-day responses to queries. There were no surprises — risks were flagged early and resolved before they became issues.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes, the project was delivered on the agreed date and within budget. Their estimates were realistic and they managed scope carefully, flagging any potential changes before they impacted the timeline or cost.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Significant. Since go-live we have seen measurable improvements in operational efficiency, customer satisfaction scores have risen, and the solution has already paid back a substantial portion of the investment. The team built something we are genuinely proud of.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their genuine investment in our success. They didn't just execute a spec — they brought ideas, challenged assumptions, and cared about the outcome as much as we did. The quality of the codebase and documentation also stood out.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely and without hesitation. We have already referred two colleagues, and we are actively scoping the next phase of work with them. They are our go-to partner for AR/VR Development projects going forward.

Company Info

Founded 2011
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.6/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Roughly how long does a project with codeparc take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, codeparc can scale resources based on project urgency.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like codeparc to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as codeparc, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Government & Public Sector, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Sports & Fitness, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does codeparc only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
codeparc isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including Switzerland, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What's actually in codeparc's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but codeparc commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in Switzerland.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of codeparc instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving codeparc a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Government & Public Sector, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Sports & Fitness, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What kind of software work does codeparc take on?
codeparc typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
Has codeparc actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like codeparc — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Government & Public Sector, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Sports & Fitness, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Does codeparc actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, codeparc included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Government & Public Sector, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Sports & Fitness, and it has been operating since 2011.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with codeparc?
Most businesses reach codeparc through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Government & Public Sector, Energy & Utilities, Nonprofit & NGO, Media & Entertainment and Sports & Fitness, and it has served clients in Switzerland.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies