Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

DIGIVIE Infosystems

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
+33749438945 info@digivie.fr Visit Website

About DIGIVIE Infosystems

DIGIVIE Infosystems is a software development company specialized in mobile applications, websites, and Salesforce development services. They use advanced technologies across any domain. Their team is constantly delivering the projects which focus on business-driven solutions and increase the client’s profitability in this digital era. DIGIVIE Infosystems focuses on cloud-based services with Salesforce, one of the topmost cloud platforms that allow customer’s data with high response in marketing and improve work efficiency. Here, you will get best service for RM platform, web applications, and mobile applications.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Web Design Cloud Solutions Cloud Computing Software CMS Solutions

Industries Served

Insurance Financial Services Telecommunications Environmental Services Real Estate Government & Public Sector

DIGIVIE Infosystems Reviews

Write a Review

DevOps toolchain that compressed our two-week release cycle to same-day deployments

Fatima Al-Suwaidi / Head of Digital Strategy - Gulf FinTech Holdings
Verified
Jan 19, 2026

Project summary: Our agents were spending more time managing data across disconnected systems than managing relationships. We needed a unified platform to give them that time back.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
3.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeDevOps Services
IndustryReal Estate
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationApr 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Gulf FinTech Holdings, a growth-stage Real Estate business based in Abu Dhabi, UAE. As Head of Digital Strategy my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our DevOps Services capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily DevOps Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Abu Dhabi, UAE and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Real Estate sector looking for DevOps Services expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Custom platform that our engineering team is still proud to maintain two years later

Radosław Kowalczyk / Head of Development - Wisła Software Sp zoo
Verified
Jan 11, 2026

Project summary: Digital service standards required all citizen-facing applications to meet accessibility and performance benchmarks that our inherited systems failed. Remediation was not viable — we needed a replacement.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Wisła Software Sp zoo operates in the Government & Public Sector sector with headquarters in Warsaw, Poland. In my role as Head of Development I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Software Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Software Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2020
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.5

FAQs

Does DIGIVIE Infosystems only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
DIGIVIE Infosystems isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including France, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can I just hire developers from DIGIVIE Infosystems to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like DIGIVIE Infosystems, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Environmental Services, Government & Public Sector, Financial Services, Real Estate and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.
What makes DIGIVIE Infosystems worth considering over other options?
What tends to set DIGIVIE Infosystems apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2020, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What does DIGIVIE Infosystems's actual delivery process look like week to week?
DIGIVIE Infosystems generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Computing Software, Cloud Solutions, CMS Solutions, Mobile App Development and Web Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Roughly how long does a project with DIGIVIE Infosystems take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, DIGIVIE Infosystems can scale resources based on project urgency.
Has DIGIVIE Infosystems actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like DIGIVIE Infosystems — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Environmental Services, Government & Public Sector, Financial Services, Real Estate and Telecommunications, and its listed capabilities span Cloud Computing Software, Cloud Solutions, CMS Solutions, Mobile App Development and Web Design.
Is DIGIVIE Infosystems more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where DIGIVIE Infosystems is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Computing Software, Cloud Solutions, CMS Solutions, Mobile App Development and Web Design, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Environmental Services, Government & Public Sector, Financial Services, Real Estate and Telecommunications.
What kind of software work does DIGIVIE Infosystems take on?
DIGIVIE Infosystems typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Cloud Computing Software, Cloud Solutions, CMS Solutions, Mobile App Development and Web Design.
What's actually in DIGIVIE Infosystems's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but DIGIVIE Infosystems commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Environmental Services, Government & Public Sector, Financial Services, Real Estate and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies