Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Mercury Intermedia

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (6 reviews)
+16156618868 hello@mercury.io Visit Website

About Mercury Intermedia

Mercury Intermedia develops strategic, mission-critical mobile apps and platforms for major commercial media, enterprise, and higher education institutions. The quality of the relationships they develop with our clients is as important to them as the quality of our work. They have a proud history of maintaining long-term collaborations with the brands that they serve.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Cloud Solutions

Industries Served

Insurance Healthcare Financial Services Government & Public Sector Telecommunications Logistics & Supply Chain

Mercury Intermedia Reviews

Write a Review

Analytics foundation that lets us answer attribution questions we had given up asking

Flynn Buchanan / GM of Technology - Pacific Rim Commerce Group
Verified
Jan 07, 2026

Project summary: Warehouse management inefficiencies were adding cost and introducing errors at a rate that was becoming visible to clients. A modernised WMS was the agreed solution internally — we needed a partner to build it.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
3.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryLogistics & Supply Chain
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJun 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As GM of Technology at Pacific Rim Commerce Group I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Logistics & Supply Chain operations in Perth, Australia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Digital Marketing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Digital Marketing approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Logistics & Supply Chain contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Perth, Australia and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Digital Marketing programme in the Logistics & Supply Chain space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2005
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.2/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.2
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.3
Communication
3.8

FAQs

What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Mercury Intermedia?
Most companies structured like Mercury Intermedia give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Insurance, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain and Healthcare, and it has served clients in USA.
What kinds of industries has Mercury Intermedia actually built for?
Mercury Intermedia has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Financial Services, Insurance, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain and Healthcare.
Has Mercury Intermedia actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Mercury Intermedia — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Insurance, Government & Public Sector, Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain and Healthcare, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What does Mercury Intermedia's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Mercury Intermedia generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Roughly how long does a project with Mercury Intermedia take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Mercury Intermedia can scale resources based on project urgency.
Can Mercury Intermedia take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Mercury Intermedia — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in USA.
What kind of software work does Mercury Intermedia take on?
Mercury Intermedia typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.
Is Mercury Intermedia more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Mercury Intermedia is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in USA.
What should I expect to pay to work with Mercury Intermedia?
What Mercury Intermedia charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Mercury Intermedia's typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies