Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Paper Kite

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
N/A hello@paperkite.co.nz Visit Website

About Paper Kite

They develop world-class, best-selling mobile app solutions tailored to their client's specifications over various platforms. They have worked for clients of every size, they have met notably tight deadlines and they have crafted everything. They are an established team of passionate, knowledgeable and experienced professionals, perfectly suited to dealing with all aspects of mobile development.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development UI-UX Design Cloud Solutions

Industries Served

Travel & Hospitality Agriculture Insurance Advertising & Marketing Automotive Aerospace & Defense

Paper Kite Reviews

Write a Review

Multiplayer infrastructure that held through a launch-day traffic spike we had not fully anticipated

Omar Al-Farsi / Chief Technology Officer - Falcon Digital Ventures
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Our connected vehicle platform needed to handle telemetry data from an expanding EV fleet while supporting over-the-air update orchestration. No off-the-shelf platform handled both requirements well.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
3.5
Schedule
3.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Technology Officer at Falcon Digital Ventures I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Automotive operations in Dubai, UAE. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Automotive segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Game Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Game Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Dubai, UAE and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Outstanding service and exceptional results

Jessica Moore / Head of Digital - EduTech Australia
Verified
Oct 19, 2023

Project summary: We required a custom platform that would give us a measurable competitive advantage in our market.

From the discovery workshop to the final handover, the experience was seamless. The team invested real effort in understanding our business goals before writing a single line of code, and that foundation paid dividends throughout. Every milestone was hit, every deliverable was polished, and the few issues that arose were resolved before we even had to ask. The solution has already delivered measurable ROI and we are planning our next engagement with them.

PROS

Deep technical expertise, professional project management, responsive support, great value

CONS

Wish we had engaged them sooner; no meaningful issues to report

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMay 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a Head of Digital-led organisation operating in the Aerospace & Defense sector. My role involves overseeing strategic technology decisions and vendor partnerships. We have been growing steadily and needed a trusted partner to help us scale our digital capabilities.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our primary challenge was modernising our Aerospace & Defense operations through E-commerce Development. Legacy systems were limiting our agility and we needed a solution that could scale with our growth ambitions and integrate with our existing infrastructure.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They delivered a comprehensive E-commerce Development engagement covering requirements analysis, solution architecture, full-cycle development, QA testing, deployment, and post-launch support. The scope was well-defined and executed without scope creep.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their demonstrated expertise in E-commerce Development and a strong portfolio of Aerospace & Defense projects set them apart during our evaluation. The discovery call gave us confidence they truly understood our domain, not just the technology.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Exceptionally well. They ran a structured discovery process, asked insightful questions, and produced a detailed requirements document that captured nuances we hadn't even articulated ourselves. That foundation made the entire project smoother.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. We had a dedicated project manager, weekly status calls, a shared project board, and same-day responses to queries. There were no surprises — risks were flagged early and resolved before they became issues.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes, the project was delivered on the agreed date and within budget. Their estimates were realistic and they managed scope carefully, flagging any potential changes before they impacted the timeline or cost.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Significant. Since go-live we have seen measurable improvements in operational efficiency, customer satisfaction scores have risen, and the solution has already paid back a substantial portion of the investment. The team built something we are genuinely proud of.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their genuine investment in our success. They didn't just execute a spec — they brought ideas, challenged assumptions, and cared about the outcome as much as we did. The quality of the codebase and documentation also stood out.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely and without hesitation. We have already referred two colleagues, and we are actively scoping the next phase of work with them. They are our go-to partner for E-commerce Development projects going forward.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.6

FAQs

What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Paper Kite to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Paper Kite, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What kind of software work does Paper Kite take on?
Paper Kite typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
What's actually in Paper Kite's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Paper Kite commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing and Agriculture.
Has Paper Kite actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Paper Kite — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing and Agriculture, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Is Paper Kite more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Paper Kite is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in New-zealand, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What should I expect to pay to work with Paper Kite?
What Paper Kite charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Paper Kite's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Paper Kite?
Most companies structured like Paper Kite give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Would Paper Kite be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Paper Kite tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has served clients in New-zealand, and it has been operating since 2010.
What makes Paper Kite worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Paper Kite apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2010, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies